A breather creates a vacuum leak and unmetered air going into the engine. Yes it was done that way in the 70's. That in itself doesn't make it proper. In those days the engine was tuned for the vacuum leak. The breather setup changed for a reason and it wasn't just for emissions.
ALL modern engines including the 302 prior to be discontinued run a PCV system with negative crank case pressure for a good reason. I don't remember any of them having issues with gaskets sucking in.
Beg to differ.....
When the PCV valve is in the valve cover and the other cover is capped there is very little air being pulled through the PCV valve. It is pretty much a closed system.
On a "not wore out" engine even the smallest of vacuum to the valve covers will eleminate the oil smells and other slimyness under the hood.
Check out the engine of any new engine and you will see a plastic tube going from the valve cover to the intake plenum ahead of the MAF. It is a modern PVC set up.
You can and we did up the HP with a vacuum pump. I never bought the idea that it "sucked" the rings in tighter - we used gas ported pistons and you can't get a better seal than that. My theory is that taking the air out of the block means less air having to be moved around below the the pistons as they move up and down and that means less work for the engine. Having the pump fail would cost us a tenth. That is fairly sizable.
I like road tubes as they coat the underside of your car with an oil mist and keep it from rusting. Kind of like a continuous Z-barting treatment.
(not really - they are stinky)
Paul