Crazy Thought

7173Mustangs.com

Help Support 7173Mustangs.com:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Sep 21, 2010
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Location
Las Vegas
My Car
1972 mustang fastback 302
I've been wondering for a while now if anyone has ever tried putting 302 tunnel port heads on a cleveland. I know the 302's couldn't pull enough air for them to work properly but i wonder if a cleveland could.

 
No, no they're not. The boss 302 which came out in 1969 used the same heads as the cleveland but the tunnel port 302 which was the same block as the boss had huge ported heads that more resembled the boss 429 heads or the 427 SOHC heads.

The heads proved futile on the track because the 302's just couldn't rev high enough to utilize the large ports of the head. So Ford grabbed heads off the upcoming cleveland and put them on the tunnel port block thus getting the boss.

I realize boss heads are the same as cleveland, but the tunnel port are completely different. They are also quite rare. Thats why I'm asking is someone might have ever put them on another engine because of the collectability status of those heads.

 
Right so now that, that is out of the way. Because the tunnel port head is so rare it might not have been tried before. It should bolt right on. The manifold would have to custom made. But the benifit of trying to put it on the cleveland is the large main bearings would let you rev the engine higher possibly generating the CFM needed for the heads to be benificial.

 
Right so now that, that is out of the way. Because the tunnel port head is so rare it might not have been tried before. It should bolt right on. The manifold would have to custom made. But the benifit of trying to put it on the cleveland is the large main bearings would let you rev the engine higher possibly generating the CFM needed for the heads to be benificial.
Might as well be fuel injected ;)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top