Don65Stang
Well-known member
Which is better Haynes or Chiltons? ...or another brand? Ford shop manuals don't count.
+ 1 on the " Motor " manuals, Have some dating back to 1953. Don't really use them anymore since they are so old and brittle, But in my younger days all i ever usedI have an old "Motor" repair manual from back in the 70's. It is a big hard bound manual that covers from 1969 through 1976. It has very detailed information.
So someone needs to invent a grease proof cover for the iPad.I use the forum!
Seriously!!... between you guys and what i can find in the internet i'm almost able to do anything i need for now
What you're saying is very useful for guys like me that doesn't have any preferences on which way to go with manuals Thanks!I only use the factory manuals, no matter which car. And the Ford manuals from the early 70s are good.
No other manual is that detailed and specific.
Most Haynes and Chilton manuals are much too diffuse on information, because usually a wide range of cars is covered for economic reasons of the issuer.
Also I prefer the printed versions over the PDF laptop version.
I have an old "Motor" repair manual from back in the 70's. It is a big hard bound manual that covers from 1969 through 1976. It has very detailed information.
I too use the Motor manuals.I bought mine at an auction 10-15 years ago after a shop closed dating back to 1953 also.I have tried haynes and chiltons they get you half way there and are vague.(so universal)+1 on the "Motor" manuals. Much better than Haynes or Chiltons. Chuck
I don't have any idea about the manual by Haynes or chiltons! but I just wanted to agree with Spechti... I am also comfortable with the printed ones...Also I prefer the printed versions over the PDF laptop version.