For all you Edelbrock Carb fans

Help Support 7173Mustangs.com:

Joined
Sep 12, 2015
Messages
5,424
Reaction score
628
Location
SW Ontario
My Car
1971 Mustang Mach 1, M code, 4 speed.
A friend called me today looking for a Cleveland motor. Somehow we got on the subject of Edelbrock carbs and intakes as well as Edelbrock heads for Clevelands. Long story short, he's a big fan for his Mopar car(s) so he convinced me to take a look at some YouTube videos on Edelbrock carbs and their set up.

Now, to be fair, I have not looked at all he sent, 6 of them, but I'll post them here for all you Edelbrock fans in our group. I'm still not one of them, nor likely will be, but some of this is very interesting stuff, especially on fuel pressure.

Here you go. I still think they just look WEIRD!

 

John J

VIP Members
Joined
May 26, 2013
Messages
1,411
Reaction score
26
Location
michigan
My Car
1973 red convertible 351 4 V
I know that I lot of people don't like them. But I have had my Edlebrock 1406 for over 5 year with no issues. It was a huge improvement over the stock 

motorcraft carburetor.

John J

 
Joined
Dec 23, 2018
Messages
829
Reaction score
194
Location
UK
My Car
Various
I don't have any preference or prejudice ... a carb is a carb to me... like a light bulb is a light bulb 

I'm also a big mopar fan Chargers, GTO's , Challengers SuperBee's etc. 

...what's wrong with Edelbrock ?

 
Joined
Sep 12, 2015
Messages
5,424
Reaction score
628
Location
SW Ontario
My Car
1971 Mustang Mach 1, M code, 4 speed.
Hey Bud, GTO is Pontiac  :whistling:
There is always one in the crowd...
 Hey, he's a Brit, we should give him some slack!! I also at one point thought GTO's were Mopar........ many years ago that is!

Actually, the GTO is an awesome car and would have fit right in to the Mopar family.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Dec 23, 2018
Messages
829
Reaction score
194
Location
UK
My Car
Various
OK, OK OKaaaaaaay  ... I added the GTO because I love those too :whistling:

how about the original question guys ... "...whats wrong with Edelbrock" ?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Sep 12, 2015
Messages
5,424
Reaction score
628
Location
SW Ontario
My Car
1971 Mustang Mach 1, M code, 4 speed.
OK, OK OKaaaaaaay  ... I added the GTO because I love those too :whistling:

how about the original question guys ... "...whats wrong with Edelbrock" ?
Don't worry, "anybody can make a mistake...…. said the Hedgehog climbing off the clothes brush!!" (my Dad's old saying)

But, did anybody watch the videos?

 
Joined
Dec 23, 2018
Messages
829
Reaction score
194
Location
UK
My Car
Various
Yeah ... But I've used Holley, Weber and Edelbrock in my sorded, disgusting past. At the moment I have pedestrian 600cfm 1406 elec choke performer series in my green machine. Webers being the most annoying for me ... sneeze and they'll block a capillary.

Is it one of these situations where one hairy stereotype prefer Holley's and the other Edel's ?

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Lazarus

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 19, 2019
Messages
191
Reaction score
69
Location
NC
My Car
1973 Mustang Convertible 302
1972 Mustang Convertible 351-2V/TKO600
OK, OK OKaaaaaaay  ... I added the GTO because I love those too :whistling:

how about the original question guys ... "...whats wrong with Edelbrock" ?

Mopar did make the GTX as well, so it’s certainly an understandable mistake anyway I think.. I myself was originally a GM guy (sorta raised that way) who loved all muscle cars, but eventually settled on 71-73 Mustangs as my favorite.

I am by no means a carburetor expert, but I have had several 600cfm 1406 Edelbrocks, and one Thunder series 650cfm (I forget the model number). I found them to be excellent, reliable, and inexpensive carburetors. They are a little harder to tune for higher performance applications, compared to some others. I think the tunability of a Holley is a somewhat better/easier, but I had a bad experience with a fuel leak with a Holley that made me lean towards the Edelbrock design (at least between those two).

So I have had really good experience personally with the Edelbrock carburetors, but do understand how some folks see them as geared a little more toward an out-of-the-box disposable carburetor.  But I can’t really penalize them for being great out of the box but somewhat harder to tune.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Sep 12, 2015
Messages
5,424
Reaction score
628
Location
SW Ontario
My Car
1971 Mustang Mach 1, M code, 4 speed.
Is it one of these situations where one hairy stereotype prefer Holley's and the other Edel's ?
 More than likely. 

 I'm not even sure I  like Holley that much anymore after issues I've had to deal with over the last year or so. For now, the piggy bank isn't fat enough for me to change it, but if I did, I think I'd go for a Quick Fuel (now owned by Holley) HR 735. The SA 670 just seems to be not quite enough air. That again could just be me.

 

Mister 4x4

Too Big to Sneak
Staff member
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Aug 12, 2010
Messages
8,033
Reaction score
244
Location
San Angelo, Texas
My Car
1971 Mustang Mach 1
I'm an Edelbrock fan, for sure.  

Every hot rod that's ever been in my orbit with an Edelbrock on it has never had carb issues aside from simple tuning adjustments needed to match up with timing (my '78 K5 Blazer was my first, and I loved it!).  

Most of the Holley-equipped cars also ran really well, but there were more 'leakers' among that crowd.  I think the term 'carburetor rebuild' was copyrighted by Holley, since it seems like they need it more often than most.  ;) :D

Edelbrocks are not without their own issues involving age, wear & tear, and ill tuning (usually by the owner), but just like Holleys being preferred and working better for some people, Edelbrocks are preferred and work better for me and many of my friends.

I'll check out the videos later tonight - they appear to be blocked by the proxy server here at work.

 
Joined
Sep 12, 2015
Messages
5,424
Reaction score
628
Location
SW Ontario
My Car
1971 Mustang Mach 1, M code, 4 speed.
I'm an Edelbrock fan, for sure.  

Every hot rod that's ever been in my orbit with an Edelbrock on it has never had carb issues aside from simple tuning adjustments needed to match up with timing (my '78 K5 Blazer was my first, and I loved it!).  

Most of the Holley-equipped cars also ran really well, but there were more 'leakers' among that crowd.  I think the term 'carburetor rebuild' was copyrighted by Holley, since it seems like they need it more often than most.  ;) :D  

Edelbrocks are not without their own issues involving age, wear & tear, and ill tuning (usually by the owner), but just like Holleys being preferred and working better for some people, Edelbrocks are preferred and work better for me and many of my friends.

I'll check out the videos later tonight - they appear to be blocked by the proxy server here at work.
 I'd be most interested in your opinion. Not that it will change my mind. I too want to take a good look at all of them, not had a chance either and I don't work!

 

Mister 4x4

Too Big to Sneak
Staff member
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Aug 12, 2010
Messages
8,033
Reaction score
244
Location
San Angelo, Texas
My Car
1971 Mustang Mach 1
Well, the videos were interesting, and pretty much confirmed everything my buddy Jim had to say about Edelbrock carbs - except for the 'not ideal for racing' bit.  Dropping them onto an engine out of the box is not all that far fetched of an idea.  Another friend had a '68 Impala 4-door with a 350, and his factory Rochester was in bad need of a rebuild.  Gave it the college try and it still wasn't happy.  So, he bit the bullet and went with a 1406 - out of the box, 95% of his fuel delivery issues were resolved.  A little bit of timing and air/fuel mix adjustment and it was running almost perfect.

The 'not ideal for racing bit' is subjective.  Granted, it's not as easily reconfigurable as Holleys are right there on the engine - changing the jets requires a bit more work that you probably don't want to do right on top of the engine with the open throat right there.  But the reason for that is the one-piece chassis that will not leak unless the seals around the shafts fail, at which point any carburetor would need a rebuild to remedy that.

As far as performance goes, I think they're a lot more consistent and don't require adjustments depending on weather and seasonal conditions that might be required for others - set 'em right and forget about it.  I haven't touched any of the settings or adjustments on mine since it was installed back in 2013.  It fires up every time and runs great whether it's cooler during what passes for winter here in West Texas, or if it's pushing past 100 during the summer half of the year.

I think after watching that 1406 video, I might be inclined to reset my fuel pressure regulator down to 3 psi - it's currently at 4.5.  All of that will be a moot point once I swap it out for the fuel injection system, though... which is also made by Edelbrock.

Thanks for sharing, though!  Interesting stuff! ::thumb::

 
Joined
Dec 23, 2018
Messages
829
Reaction score
194
Location
UK
My Car
Various
What this tells me is ... no sooner does the factory produce the car with the factory carb...everyone rips it off, hurls it over their shoulder in preference to an after market one. 

I had a friend with a 1978 trans am (Bandit style) he said the GM carb was pathetic and swapped it out. I know of a Plymouth duster that lives 15 miles from me with a Holley nailed to it and someone (not me) must've disliked what Ford had given them and hammered the 1406 on there with different filter. 

Am I to imagine that in the good ol' US of A ...a bunch of big hairy wrenchers have massive bar fights over who's carb is best ?  lollerz  



:D

 
Last edited by a moderator:

c9zx

VIP Members
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Messages
5,341
Reaction score
273
Location
Mustang, OK.
My Car
1972 Mach 1 Q code
2007 GT
1969 Cougar Eliminator B302
CSX 7000 Shelby Cobra FIA
2020 Edge ST
2002 F250 V10
A friend called me today looking for a Cleveland motor. Somehow we got on the subject of Edelbrock carbs and intakes as well as Edelbrock heads for Clevelands. Long story short, he's a big fan for his Mopar car(s) so he convinced me to take a look at some YouTube videos on Edelbrock carbs and their set up.

Now, to be fair, I have not looked at all he sent, 6 of them, but I'll post them here for all you Edelbrock fans in our group. I'm still not one of them, nor likely will be, but some of this is very interesting stuff, especially on fuel pressure.

Here you go. I still think they just look WEIRD!

The first one is an Ad. The rest are just funny, "3 lbs. of fuel pressure no matter what carb it is." The stuff on you tube is truly amazing. Chuck

 
Joined
Sep 12, 2015
Messages
5,424
Reaction score
628
Location
SW Ontario
My Car
1971 Mustang Mach 1, M code, 4 speed.
Well guys, that's an interesting contrast between Eric and Chuck's thoughts on the Edelbrock carbs. 1sostatic is his usual hilarious self! 

I have to admit, I still have not had time study them, but I will for sure, then I can add my 2 cents worth.

Thanks for your comments and input, the debate continues...……..

EDIT: Ok I just looked at all the video's.

Now, I know very little about carbs in general other than the basic to intermediate stuff. I've learned a lot over the last few years, thanks to the members here.

So, here's my take away, His set-up does not look very professional, more like something anyone could cobble up in the garage. He shows and uses a GLASS filter, a no-no as far as I'm concerned, (ok, it a test rig, so maybe here) He state that the secondary's open without a load on the motor. I thought a load was needed for the secondary's to kick in, but perhaps I'm wrong in this case. As far as 3 lbs fuel pressure on any carb no matter what brand, well we all know we don't want too much, but could that be too little?

Lastly, I'm still not convinced. There are some very good points to the Edelbrock carbs, but I think I'll stick with more traditional types I'm familiar with.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

c9zx

VIP Members
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Messages
5,341
Reaction score
273
Location
Mustang, OK.
My Car
1972 Mach 1 Q code
2007 GT
1969 Cougar Eliminator B302
CSX 7000 Shelby Cobra FIA
2020 Edge ST
2002 F250 V10
Well guys, that's an interesting contrast between Eric and Chuck's thoughts on the Edelbrock carbs. 1sostatic is his usual hilarious self! 

I have to admit, I still have not had time study them, but I will for sure, then I can add my 2 cents worth.

Thanks for your comments and input, the debate continues...……..
Full disclosure, I didn't watch all of them in their entirety, so I may have missed something. The cobbled up mess of an engine he had in the videos speaks volumes about his skill and knowledge, at least to me it does. I'm not trying to bad mouth Ed carbs, some are happy with them. I'm just not one of those people. Chuck

 
Top