I tend to cut folks a lot of slack re: how they set their cars up. As for "Convertible Mach 1s," tribute "Boss 302," tribute "Mach 1" vehicles, as long as they are shown to be tribute vehicles when being sold I am fine. If someone posts info about their car and classify it as something that it obviously isn;t I tend to lat it lay. They are proud of the vehicle they have, and perhaps they are so enamored that they opt t do a tribute in the event of not having the money to get a "real" model that they are so intrigued by. No harm, no foul as long as nobody is buying something the vehicle isn't.
Frankly, I have seen some very nice looking tribute cars, and some very nicely presented Convertible Mach 1s. Who am I to judge what a person does to their own chariot? I know we have done a lot to our 73 Mustangs, well beyond what the factory provided originally. I feel our upgrades have been tasteful, and we did nothing to try displaying something they aren't. And, they are set up for how we want them to be. I offer no apologies for that. The two GT500s, on the other hand, are pretty much bone stock. Although in the 1969 Shelby GT500 I did replace the door glass with 1970 glass with the bolt-in holes vs the 69 glue-in glass that has proven to not be one of Ford's better ideas. And, having acquired the door glass from ECS Automotive Concepts, I did have the proper CarLite logo and date codes etched into the glass, so they look factory original (
https://ecs-automotive-concepts.myshopify.com/collections/ford-glass).