Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Member Map
Current visitors
Tutorials
Engine, Transmission, Drive Line, Diff, etc...
Exterior, Body, Chassis & Paint
Interior Restoration
Brakes & Suspension
Electrical & Lighting
Presentation, Polish & Detailing
General Maintenance & Repair
Misc Tutorials
Forum Tutorials
7173 Wiki
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
General 71-73 Discussion
71-73 Mustang Talk
What Powertrain for My 73 Mustang Convertible?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support 7173Mustangs.com:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="71ProjectJunk" data-source="post: 405437" data-attributes="member: 7655"><p>You can get decent gas mileage from a 351W if you get a good 6 speed transmission, and don't go crazy on the rear end gearing or camshaft. I bet you could get 20 MPG+ with EFI, a 6 speed trans, 3.25 gears, and a cam with about 215 degrees of duration at .050 or less. Some good heads with smallish ports and a good dual plane intake. Need to keep the velocity up on the intake side. Some good headers and a good dual exhaust should complete the package. Remember that a 1987-1993 5.0 Mustang GT got 22 mpg on the highway and 15 MPG on the city, 17 MPG combined with a 5 speed. The 351W is a little bigger engine so the fuel economy will suffer a bit, but it should still be close. You need to calculate how much you will need to spend to get a new engine and transmission plus all the fabrication VS how much better gas mileage you will get. Also how much you will actually drive the car. Most of these cars are weekend drivers and are lucky to do 1000 miles a year now. I know mine don't get close to 1000 miles a year.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="71ProjectJunk, post: 405437, member: 7655"] You can get decent gas mileage from a 351W if you get a good 6 speed transmission, and don't go crazy on the rear end gearing or camshaft. I bet you could get 20 MPG+ with EFI, a 6 speed trans, 3.25 gears, and a cam with about 215 degrees of duration at .050 or less. Some good heads with smallish ports and a good dual plane intake. Need to keep the velocity up on the intake side. Some good headers and a good dual exhaust should complete the package. Remember that a 1987-1993 5.0 Mustang GT got 22 mpg on the highway and 15 MPG on the city, 17 MPG combined with a 5 speed. The 351W is a little bigger engine so the fuel economy will suffer a bit, but it should still be close. You need to calculate how much you will need to spend to get a new engine and transmission plus all the fabrication VS how much better gas mileage you will get. Also how much you will actually drive the car. Most of these cars are weekend drivers and are lucky to do 1000 miles a year now. I know mine don't get close to 1000 miles a year. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
General 71-73 Discussion
71-73 Mustang Talk
What Powertrain for My 73 Mustang Convertible?
Join the conversation!
Register today and take advantage of membership benefits.
It's FREE!
Participate in both public and private conversations with people that share your interest
Start new threads
See less ads
Enter your email address to join:
Thank you! Please check your email inbox to continue.
There's already a member associated with this email address. Please
log in
or
retrieve your password
.
Already a member?
Click here to log in
Don't like ads?
Did you know that registered members can turn off the ads?
Register today and take advantage of membership benefits.
Enter your email address to join:
Thank you! Please check your email inbox to continue.
There's already a member associated with this email address. Please
log in
or
retrieve your password
.
Already a member?
Click here to log in
Top