Mustang Monthly (again)

[Don C]

The March issue has a couple of Perkins inspired articles, one where Bob shows what the undercarriage of an original '73 convertible is supposed to look like. The other is the tool to prevent front suspension damage when raising Mustangs on a lift.

Probably not enough to make me renew my subscription after they totally ignored us last month in their Readers Rides article.

 

[DK73]

Wow I am so sorry to hear about it! Which I don't understand why? Because of giving information about every year's of Mustang's... We love our years as much as others. They chose not to chow our! Which I understand that you are finding wrong Don... Car magazine has to show every Car Mark. And not take some of the table just because they like or don't like. [THUMBS UP SIGN]

Sendt fra min F8331 med Tapatalk

 

[Mister 4x4]

I pretty much made up my mind around Christmas time that I really don't care what they do - I'm not renewing.  I've been getting MM since 2010, and I'm pretty sure that between all of those issues, there's not enough 7173 content between 'em all to make up a standard-sized issue full of nothing but 7173 stuff... and I'm counting ads, Readers Rides, feature and tech articles, and even the occasional pictures of events where you might see only a grille, taillight, or profile of the quarter windows hidden behind the others cars.

I remember one issue about 2 years ago where there were no less than 4 '67 Mustang fastback feature articles alone.  I can count on both hands how many feature articles there have been about 7173s since 2010 - it averages 1.8 articles per calendar year.  I know we've always been more fortunate than the Mustang II guys, but only until lately with the current editor... he's a documented self-proclaimed "M-ll lover/7173-hater."

Pffft.  Whatever. :shootself: