OK -- controversial question for ya'aaall
Mustang used to be a brand in its own right.
I thought the new Mustangs must be good ... but until today I had never seen one in the flesh.
Would you have the new Mustang ...if you had enuff Franklins and Jacksons?
It has $65000 styling and looks .....a $65000 engine and $1,000,000,000,000,000,000 of history and heritage.
..but the interior ! ! ! ! ...woof - WTF ! ! ! ! ! ! ... what rabid dog ... made out of recycled water bottles, BIC biros and a wheelie bin .
The quality was so bargain basement I thought I was in a 1990's Nissan.
I have never seen such an uninteresting, uninspired pile of goo since Volvo came out with their 1980's boxy monstrosities.
I bet they got someone more used to finger painting to style it
What an unremitting sea of grey, soulless dreariness.
I'm glad I can get into my 1971 and have quality that is galactically better than these expensive trash cans.
Mustang used to be a brand in its own right.
I thought the new Mustangs must be good ... but until today I had never seen one in the flesh.
Would you have the new Mustang ...if you had enuff Franklins and Jacksons?
It has $65000 styling and looks .....a $65000 engine and $1,000,000,000,000,000,000 of history and heritage.
..but the interior ! ! ! ! ...woof - WTF ! ! ! ! ! ! ... what rabid dog ... made out of recycled water bottles, BIC biros and a wheelie bin .
The quality was so bargain basement I thought I was in a 1990's Nissan.
I have never seen such an uninteresting, uninspired pile of goo since Volvo came out with their 1980's boxy monstrosities.
I bet they got someone more used to finger painting to style it
What an unremitting sea of grey, soulless dreariness.
I'm glad I can get into my 1971 and have quality that is galactically better than these expensive trash cans.
Last edited by a moderator: