- Joined
- Jul 16, 2010
- Messages
- 2,908
- Reaction score
- 12
- Location
- Memphis, TN
- My Car
- 1969 Mach 1
1973 Mach 1
1973 Grande
1989 LX 5.0L
2003 Mercury Marauder
2015 Lincoln MKT
With the increased interest in classic cars, there are many (out there) who are trying to "make a buck" through often dishonest moves. As some of you may know, you can now pretty much duplicate a complete car and even get documentation (counterfeit data plates) to back up your act.
This week's question has to do with identifying a 1972 Mach I clone that has a counterfeit data plate that contains a "flaw." For the purpose of this exercise, the following applies:
VIN:2F05F183481
Color: A
Trim: 5A
Body Code: 63D
Date: 12D
DSO: 94
Axle: B
Trans: X
Who will be the first to identify the "mistake" on the data plate that identifies this data plate as a possible forgery, in spite of the changes that were made to the car to make it appear to be a 1972 Mach I?
BT
This week's question has to do with identifying a 1972 Mach I clone that has a counterfeit data plate that contains a "flaw." For the purpose of this exercise, the following applies:
VIN:2F05F183481
Color: A
Trim: 5A
Body Code: 63D
Date: 12D
DSO: 94
Axle: B
Trans: X
Who will be the first to identify the "mistake" on the data plate that identifies this data plate as a possible forgery, in spite of the changes that were made to the car to make it appear to be a 1972 Mach I?
BT