- Joined
- Aug 12, 2010
- Messages
- 8,302
- Reaction score
- 680
- Location
- San Angelo, Texas
- My Car
- 1971 Mustang Mach 1
Just a quick question about seam sealers: which is best?
I have some slight gaps in a few places where the floor pans didn't line up absolutely perfect (liberal use of the blocks and dollies couldn't quite get them into shape). My first thought was to use the tube-type seam sealer and effectively 'lay a bead' as you would with regular caulking - that should take care of any small gaps. But as I read the instructions, the 3M stuff I picked up says to Not use it for sealing interior joints. Doesn't say why... just says not to do it.
I also picked up some 3M brushable seam sealer (I seem to always pick up my stuff before I see one of Scott's videos showing better and cheaper alternative products), but I'm not so sure it's up to the job of bridging the gaps. It has nothing to say about using it inside or outside... or not to, either.
So - I guess the real question is: why can't one product be used inside while the other can? The ingredients are mostly the same, and the caulk-like sealer actually sets up and cures a lot quicker than the brush-on.
I was thinking the caulk-style might give off fumes for quite awhile, but I'm pretty sure my car won't be sealed up completely any time soon (need a whole set of weather stripping, after all), and based on all the dried up beads of factory seam sealer I've been removing, I'm thinking the caulk-like stuff should be fine.
Any ideas? Thoughts? Scary stories of community tragedy involving caulk-type seam sealer? Thanks!
I have some slight gaps in a few places where the floor pans didn't line up absolutely perfect (liberal use of the blocks and dollies couldn't quite get them into shape). My first thought was to use the tube-type seam sealer and effectively 'lay a bead' as you would with regular caulking - that should take care of any small gaps. But as I read the instructions, the 3M stuff I picked up says to Not use it for sealing interior joints. Doesn't say why... just says not to do it.
I also picked up some 3M brushable seam sealer (I seem to always pick up my stuff before I see one of Scott's videos showing better and cheaper alternative products), but I'm not so sure it's up to the job of bridging the gaps. It has nothing to say about using it inside or outside... or not to, either.
So - I guess the real question is: why can't one product be used inside while the other can? The ingredients are mostly the same, and the caulk-like sealer actually sets up and cures a lot quicker than the brush-on.
I was thinking the caulk-style might give off fumes for quite awhile, but I'm pretty sure my car won't be sealed up completely any time soon (need a whole set of weather stripping, after all), and based on all the dried up beads of factory seam sealer I've been removing, I'm thinking the caulk-like stuff should be fine.
Any ideas? Thoughts? Scary stories of community tragedy involving caulk-type seam sealer? Thanks!