Detector
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2011
- Messages
- 232
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- Dodge City, KS
- My Car
- 1973 Mach 1 Q Code
1995 GT Convertible
I put this thread in the Other Years of Mustangs because I felt it applied to all mustangs.
OK, the whole "actual mileage" thing. How do we truly know what the actual mileage is? I've owned several mustangs that the title could have been used to imply actual mileage as super low simply because they put what ever number was on the odometer. Now obviously if your cars odometer is showing 12,000 and the title says it was last titled with 88,000 you can assume it has at least turned over once. But it doesn't always work out that way. Most simply use the last title mileage statement as their indicator for actual mileage. Of course what else can you do?
What made me bring this up is a listing I saw on eBay of a 1966 mustang with 12,000 "actual miles" I thought just how the heck does a 46 year old car end up only having 12,000 miles? Now if someone bought it and parked it, which does happen I guess, I could see a 46 year old car with only 12,000 miles, but there sure seems to be a lot of these parked cars. I believe the vast majority are not truly the actual miles or the car was wrecked and set for years before being repaired.
What cracks me up is when I see these ads of a car with say 43,000 actual miles and all the seats are worn out and the signs of years of wear and tare are obvious. They just saw the 43,000 on the odometer and the title said it had 30,000 last time it was titled so they call it actual mileage.
Another bit of misleading I see a lot of is on the fox bodys. Ever wonder why so many 1994-1998 mustangs are super low mileage? I know why. I bought a 1995 GT convertible with only 60,000 "actual miles" only to find out the odometer didn't work and it is a well known issue with these mustangs. You might also note a lot of these mustangs are for sale with non-working odometers. I bought the repair kit and fixed mine.
OK, the whole "actual mileage" thing. How do we truly know what the actual mileage is? I've owned several mustangs that the title could have been used to imply actual mileage as super low simply because they put what ever number was on the odometer. Now obviously if your cars odometer is showing 12,000 and the title says it was last titled with 88,000 you can assume it has at least turned over once. But it doesn't always work out that way. Most simply use the last title mileage statement as their indicator for actual mileage. Of course what else can you do?
What made me bring this up is a listing I saw on eBay of a 1966 mustang with 12,000 "actual miles" I thought just how the heck does a 46 year old car end up only having 12,000 miles? Now if someone bought it and parked it, which does happen I guess, I could see a 46 year old car with only 12,000 miles, but there sure seems to be a lot of these parked cars. I believe the vast majority are not truly the actual miles or the car was wrecked and set for years before being repaired.
What cracks me up is when I see these ads of a car with say 43,000 actual miles and all the seats are worn out and the signs of years of wear and tare are obvious. They just saw the 43,000 on the odometer and the title said it had 30,000 last time it was titled so they call it actual mileage.
Another bit of misleading I see a lot of is on the fox bodys. Ever wonder why so many 1994-1998 mustangs are super low mileage? I know why. I bought a 1995 GT convertible with only 60,000 "actual miles" only to find out the odometer didn't work and it is a well known issue with these mustangs. You might also note a lot of these mustangs are for sale with non-working odometers. I bought the repair kit and fixed mine.
Last edited by a moderator: