cudak888: 1971 M-code "Soylent Green" - 2024: Help me measure the frame!

7173Mustangs.com

Help Support 7173Mustangs.com:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
It would help if I used the 1971 measurement - 12.38”. Apparently, the second of those two diagrams isn't from the '72 manual, but the '73, and the front bolt location reflects the lower hole designed for the 5mph urethane bumper brackets (for those who don't know what this looks like, there's a great picture in this thread, post #17).

However, like the idler measurement, It’s still ~1/4” too far forward.

IMG_8265.jpeg

IMG_8266.jpeg

IMG_8267.jpeg

I'll give the rest of the unibody another look over, but I can't imagine ~1/4" of length getting accordioned out of this car without the rocker panel or forward leaf spring eyelet area showing evidence of absolute annihilation.

-Kurt
 
Last edited:
There's one thing I wanted to ask, for assumptions are the spawn of many errors:

I've been assuming that the "A" in 7.58A, 11.15A, 22.86A, and 47.10A all refer to the frame measurements from a central point in the car that the engineers established as the "0" location. In doing so, I added 7.58" (A) and 66.86" for a total of 74.44" (189.07cm) from the forward leaf hanger eyelet ("rear spring front hanger hole in member") to the idler arm bracket lower mounting hole. It's reflected in the earlier photo I posted of the measuring tape.

(1973 shop manual shown w/correct rear framerail measurement, but lower 5-mph front bumper mount hole):


1725840246503.png

Is there any possibility that this is an incorrect assumption, and I've added length here?

Theoretically, if 7.58" is measured from this (apparently unmarked) zero point, then I can check this by taking 7.58", adding 20", and measuring from the idler to the master control hole ("M.C.H.") in the front framerail. If that checks out, the 55.30" diagonal should as well.

-Kurt
 
You're out of my area of expertise. I'm just going to follow along here and learn.

Look at it this way: We're part of the same club then - I've never done this before.

I'm just letting the factory dimensions, Q's recommendations, and logic guide me along the way.

If anything, the most important thing I've learned in this entire project (including the initial dive into it) is to listen to Q, keep an eye out, and if something doesn't make sense, stop and take a break - it helps to sit down, clear the mind, and then look again at the factory unibody dimensions.

Sweating one's butt off trying to make things fit under the car tends to play havoc with rational thinking; the front bumper hole was a perfect example. It took a break and a few hours of unrelated tinkering to note the really obvious mistake that "1972" shop manual is actually the 1973 manual. Had I realized it from the start, I would have probably scrutinized the front bumper mounting hole measurement immediately. Instead, it took some clear-mind Googling until I wound up back in this thread looking at the two diagrams and realized the error.

It would be easy to say that everything is "good enough" at this point and weld in the right rail to where the left one is now, but it wouldn't necessarily explain the trunk floor height discrepancy. Granted, if Q thinks otherwise, I might consider it, but I think the best thing right now is to verify the front measurements off the master control hole back. More data can't hurt.

-Kurt
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Is there anyone local with a "never hit" 71-72 you can measure the distances and verify? It would be nice if you could find one on a cart or rotisserie!

This link I found is a shot in the dark, but you never know where it might lead to...
https://www.ford.com/support/category/service-maintenance/collision-assistance/

Right now, my system can only measure with the right leaf spring and idler arm out of the car, so it would have to be on a cart or belly-down on the ground.

At present, I only know Big Blue, and that car has already seen a lot more Toby Halicki-levels of "action" than mine. There are a few others in town that I know of, but none in the right state at present.

Then again, I've been off the forum for years, so I'm going to run a Google search on it with "Miami" as a keyword (and hope I get Florida and not Ohio).

EDIT: Nothing on the forum. Also checked Craigslist, Facebook Marketplace, OfferUp - lots of lousy project cars, none of them in pieces. I swear there was a '73 Mach or Sportsroof a few months ago that was sitting on top of a container, but that listing has disappeared. Might not have been Miami either.

-Kurt
 
Last edited:
I fashioned a 90 degree tram gauge to measure from the very hole that Ford engineers dubbed the “Master Control Hole” (MCH) - part of the right front framerail that is very much a part of the right front frame horn - to the lower idler bolt hole.

Here, I didn’t focus as much on making it level, as the centering pin would allow me to pivot up and down on the MCH with minor variance.

IMG_8303.jpeg

The T-slot was configured to snake around the main jackstand:

IMG_8304.jpeg

Surprise…

IMG_8306.jpeg

Note the sweep of the witness mark?

A bit of fine-tuning led to this:

IMG_8307.jpeg

I think I have my answer.

Perhaps this is a quirk of the Metuchen production line? They made the ‘71 for such a short time that it might account for the lack of documentation online - though it's not as if the '71-73s flood search engine results to begin with.

There's also the possibility that my front framerails are welded 1/4” closer to the firewall than usual.

Then there's the possibility that every ‘71-73 may reflect this, and the factory chart is, in fact, off.

IDEA: If anyone on the forum with a '71-73 on a rotisserie is game (and has nothing else better to do), I could ship out this shorter piece of T-slot around, set to the proper measurements. Thoughts? I'd love to get at least two other data points.

-Kurt
 
Last edited:
I owe everyone an update on this.

Long story short, I was finally able to get the T-slot right where it was supposed to be. I don't recall, but I think it was the measurement from the bumper support up front and the angle back to the front leaf spring eyelets that got the rest of the T-slot in the right place.

I then cut out the offending piece of framerail and slotted in @ib4stangs' piece, along with a section on the back to reinforce the joint.

I took a ton of video of this back in September and Decenber - eventually, I'll edit it together and release it when the car is rolling again - but not many photos. Got one side welded up and then discovered the flippin' framerail is galvanized. You wouldn't know it, with the speed these things rust. It turns out I had wound up burnishing the surface clean on the donor rail, so that welded fine, but not on the car. I was able to get in and clean the edges with a Dremel, but still had some blow-through issues in spots.

Working in the Florida heat with a $5 welding mask from the 1970s and the welder off a generator was just too much, so I put everything on hold. Over December, I put in an external 30A and 20A outlet on the house so I could run the Hobart 140 and not burn the house down. Silly thing has a NEMA 5-15 plug but requires a 20A circuit; a loophole in the NEC, apparently. Great way to toast wires. (Side note: I made sure the new L6-30 outlet was run with 8 AWG instead of the minimum 10 AWG. It's allowed by code and any more overhead with a welder is good overhead).

Fast forward to today. I tackled crawling under the car to weld the rest up (or as much as my back would let me). It went fairly well, all things considered, though not entirely smoothly - the gap at the front was a bit too large, and the rear butted tight. I also bit the bullet and cut the trunk floor open to check penetration and properly tack the reinforcement inside. Couldn't seem to get the galvanizing clean enough, but I was able to get penetration, and that's all I cared about.

Inner edge:

IMG_1239.jpeg

Outer edge - you can see one spot on the left (rear) edge where there was some blow-through that needed to be addressed.

This was the bit done with the generator and the terrible welding mask; the inside edge was with the new mask. It was beneficial to hear myself think, for a change.

IMG_1240.jpeg

Here's the carnage on top. That's surface rust on the trunk floor with that hateful Evaporust Gel on top of it. It's hell to get off, but it's sealed it reasonably well and has staved off any expansion.

IMG_1237.jpeg

God, why is it that the welds that appear to have the best penetration also look like complete shyte? I defer to my welder's excuses here and point out that it was next to impossible to get my head in here with the welding helmet to see what the hell I was doing.

IMG_1238.jpeg

To think, this could have been an easy job had I done it before installing the flipping trunk floor.

I've been fairly concerned about weld penetration given how thin these banana peel framerails are, and while I'm happy for the most part, there is one area I'm not certain about:

IMG_1241-circled.jpg

It's a difference in surface reflection, and I can feel it too - though that's not really an indication, because the two framerail pieces aren't perfectly in plane with each other; heck, they're fairly wavy to the touch from the factory forming. At any rate, I don't know if it is the edge of a weld I did earlier last year or a crack.

My thought is that I'll leave it be, finish the remaining welds, shrink the damage on the trunk floor and weld it back to the framerail, and once that is done, pick the car up from the end of the framerail and see if anything gets worse.

Oh - slight out-of-sequence update: Once the framerail was tacked in, I was able to confirm - without a doubt - the frame was back where it belonged, according to the position of the shackle mounts. Very happy with that part of it.

-Kurt
 
Last edited:
Back
Top