Ford Releases 2015 Mustangs

[mustang7173]

Ford Has released the new 2015 Ford Mustang! You know, it does not look that bad. I do like the new tail end section. Also, In the gallery, the rear back picture reminds me of the 66-67 mustang fastback. Ford look like they have a new winner here.

http://www.ford.com/cars/mustang/2015/?bannerid=233714|104116115|277850911|0&referrer=N3016.Yahoo

mustang7173

 

[OLE PONY]

I like it. I noticed the speedometer says "Ground Speed"; is this new?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Tapatalk

 

[mustang7173]

OLE PONY,

I believe so! It must be part of the global specs.

mustang7173

 

[Totalled]

Well, that's confirmed. Ugly.

 

[mustang7173]

All,

Check out the Ford videos on design features.

http://www.autoblog.com/2013/12/05/2015-ford-mustang-official-photos-reveal-info/

mustang7173

 

[Don65Stang]

Here are some high-res photos...

 

[mustang7173]

All,

In the Ford interior video's, they had two gauges in the center of the dash. Now, we only see three vent registry's. Dag Nabit!

mustang7173


All,

Here is the picture with the gauges!

mustang7173

 

[cudak888]

It's still just as fat as the S550, completely missing the boat on the superb, lithe look of Chazcron's Mustang6G renderings from earlier this month:

Ever so subtle; yet, ever so different. What happened to squatter beltlines and sharply-defined, three-dimensional bodysides?

Good:

FAT:

-Kurt

P.S.: For all of the "smaller Mustang" talk earlier, it's all of 0.2" shorter, but about an inch wider (not a bad thing, but it ain't smaller).

P.P.S: After everybody having rendered this thing right and left over the last year, Ford gives us 30% real photos and 70% official Ford 3D renderings. Those 3D-rendered 360 views don't hold a candle to JJW's renderings of Chazcron's model. It is no wonder Ford's marketing wagon missed the boat years ago.

 

[BigPinoyHunk]

my wife's 07 is paid off, i should convience her to get the new 2.3 4cylinder ecoboost motor. if it'll get 35-40mph highway, i'm sure she'll be hooked, especially if it still has 300hp.

 

[sm3570]

I kind of like it. I don't see how it's "fat", it looks pretty chiseled. Still not a big fan of the tail lights.

 

[cudak888]

I kind of like it. I don't see how it's "fat", it looks pretty chiseled.

:whistling:

vs.

Yep, it's fat. And stubby.

-Kurt

 

[Paul of MO]

I kind of like it. I don't see how it's "fat", it looks pretty chiseled.

:whistling:

Yep, it's fat. And stubby.

-Kurt

Looks like a Fusion and a late model mustang "got busy".

Close but I think Ford missed it - Damn.

- Paul

 

[mach71351c]

I like it. I like it allot.

 

[sm3570]

I kind of like it. I don't see how it's "fat", it looks pretty chiseled.

:whistling:

Yep, it's fat. And stubby.

-Kurt

Compared to the low, long and sleek lines of the 71-73, I agree. But there were 47 other years of Mustangs to compare it to. Totally subjective.

 

[luxstang]

I kinda like it.

 

[snakebite8]

I LIKE IT AND I WONT ONE

 

[73StangCoupe]

All,

Sorry to disappoint, but I really do like it, especially the vert. I like the lines, the front and rear fascia, not to mention the interior. I can't wait to actually sit in one. I think the designers at Ford have hit a home run with this one. I need to buy some shares of Ford... it's only $16.77 now!!

 

[Knoxferatu]

I think it looks pretty badass. In my opinion, it's the best looking Mustang since 1973.

 

[CZ-75]

To me, the circled area below is what makes our cars look great. Ford dropped the ball as far as I'm concerned. It needs more of a curve around the wheel well.