1973grandeklar
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2014
- Messages
- 405
- Reaction score
- 59
- Location
- North Carolina
- My Car
- 1973 Mustang Grande 351C 2V
1972 Mustang 'Q' code Mach 1
I have a 1969 351W from a Mustang. It is the 4V version and everything is still OEM. So I go to change the timing gear set as the OEM an aluminum gear with plastic nylon teeth. Everything looks very good, but the plastic must be getting brittle and could crack.
I had a brand new Autozone OEM timing set for a 302. I checked and it is the same part number as the one for the 351W. I installed it, put the fuel pump eccentric on, then installed the timing cover. The timing cover hits the fuel pump eccentric and there is gap at the block. The gear hub is too thick.
So I go online and check out Summit Racing and Jegs for a double roller timing set. I try to be very careful and select a set specifically for a 1969 351W mustang motor. I get the new set and install it same issue.
I need help with the 1969 timing cam gear. The crankshaft gear matches perfectly. However, the top gear has a thicker center hub and when I mount the fuel pump eccentric onto the front, it hits the timing cover!
I measure the hub heights:
Original gear hub = 0.780"
roller gear hub = 0.931"
Autozone OEM gear = 0.930"
fuel pump eccentric = 0.937"
The original stack-up is 1.717"
The new gear stack-up is 1.868"
The timing cover clearance is 1.790"
That means the original gear had 0.073" of clearance.
The new gear has 0.071 of interference
How can I fix this? Is a new fuel pump eccentric thinner (currently I have a one piece design)? Can I machine the front face of new gear?
It appears that the distance from the gear face to the back hub is identical on all three. It is the front mounting face that is different on the three gears. The second picture is an edge shot of three gears lined up, you can see the taller center behind the original gear. I tried to take pictures and show the differences. I would prefer not to machine the gear, but I can if that is the only good option. Changing the cover is not a good option.
Here is the gears with a photo taken on edge. You can see it is the center hub on the fuel pump eccentric side. The cam side is the same on all three.
I had a brand new Autozone OEM timing set for a 302. I checked and it is the same part number as the one for the 351W. I installed it, put the fuel pump eccentric on, then installed the timing cover. The timing cover hits the fuel pump eccentric and there is gap at the block. The gear hub is too thick.
So I go online and check out Summit Racing and Jegs for a double roller timing set. I try to be very careful and select a set specifically for a 1969 351W mustang motor. I get the new set and install it same issue.
I need help with the 1969 timing cam gear. The crankshaft gear matches perfectly. However, the top gear has a thicker center hub and when I mount the fuel pump eccentric onto the front, it hits the timing cover!
I measure the hub heights:
Original gear hub = 0.780"
roller gear hub = 0.931"
Autozone OEM gear = 0.930"
fuel pump eccentric = 0.937"
The original stack-up is 1.717"
The new gear stack-up is 1.868"
The timing cover clearance is 1.790"
That means the original gear had 0.073" of clearance.
The new gear has 0.071 of interference
How can I fix this? Is a new fuel pump eccentric thinner (currently I have a one piece design)? Can I machine the front face of new gear?
It appears that the distance from the gear face to the back hub is identical on all three. It is the front mounting face that is different on the three gears. The second picture is an edge shot of three gears lined up, you can see the taller center behind the original gear. I tried to take pictures and show the differences. I would prefer not to machine the gear, but I can if that is the only good option. Changing the cover is not a good option.
Here is the gears with a photo taken on edge. You can see it is the center hub on the fuel pump eccentric side. The cam side is the same on all three.
Last edited by a moderator: