- Joined
- Mar 10, 2011
- Messages
- 5,960
- Reaction score
- 112
- Location
- Oklahoma
- My Car
- 1971 Boss 351
1971 Mustang Sportsroof
1972 Q Code 4-speed conv.
This was an attempt to respond to another's comments about the 71-3 Mustangs....
Too many oversimplify when trying to explain the 1971-1973 years of the Ford Mustang. These cars were designed in Ford's design studio back in 1968; what some call the pinnacle of the performance era. During the introduction Ford was pressured to no longer support auto racing. These cars were designed to be larger and accommodate bigger and more powerful engines than ever before. They were also designed to offer a more comfortable yet sporty driving experience. They excelled in all these aspects. Some of the negative truths you mention are all driven by the automotive climate of the day. Many factors come into play and resulted in poor respective sales for the 1971-1973 model Mustangs including but not limited to - heavy emissions regulations, high targeted insurance rates, stronger Federal safety regulations, gas rationing and sometimes unavailability combined with the plethora of other very similar classed cars offered as direct sales competition - even some offered by Ford and Lincoln-Mercury! All these factors played heavy to deal the 1971 through 1973 Mustangs a severe sales disadvantage. True enough the little Falcon- based short tailed long hood 1964 1/2 Mustang started it all but they were pale in comparison to the much improved 1971-3 cars. The closest offering in the 1971- lineup that resembled the original-sized Mustang would undoubtedly be the Ford Maverick, never offered as a true performance car.
to be continued - I'm sure...
Ray
Too many oversimplify when trying to explain the 1971-1973 years of the Ford Mustang. These cars were designed in Ford's design studio back in 1968; what some call the pinnacle of the performance era. During the introduction Ford was pressured to no longer support auto racing. These cars were designed to be larger and accommodate bigger and more powerful engines than ever before. They were also designed to offer a more comfortable yet sporty driving experience. They excelled in all these aspects. Some of the negative truths you mention are all driven by the automotive climate of the day. Many factors come into play and resulted in poor respective sales for the 1971-1973 model Mustangs including but not limited to - heavy emissions regulations, high targeted insurance rates, stronger Federal safety regulations, gas rationing and sometimes unavailability combined with the plethora of other very similar classed cars offered as direct sales competition - even some offered by Ford and Lincoln-Mercury! All these factors played heavy to deal the 1971 through 1973 Mustangs a severe sales disadvantage. True enough the little Falcon- based short tailed long hood 1964 1/2 Mustang started it all but they were pale in comparison to the much improved 1971-3 cars. The closest offering in the 1971- lineup that resembled the original-sized Mustang would undoubtedly be the Ford Maverick, never offered as a true performance car.
to be continued - I'm sure...
Ray