Lower Control Arm Bushing

7173Mustangs.com

Help Support 7173Mustangs.com:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Sep 3, 2015
Messages
1,231
Reaction score
477
Location
AZ
My Car
1972 Mach 1
1971 Ranchero
On my car, the Lower Control Arms (LCA) have migrated forward and have rubbed on mounting framework. This is presumably related to the Strut Rods pulling forward for positive Caster. Wondering if any of you have experience tack welding the bushing to the control arm to prevent the bushing from moving, relative to the arm. My concern would be to damaging the rubber just inside the tach weld.
 
As stated post photos, but it sounds like in your desire to gain more caster the lca is now binding. We all want more caster, but our factory front ends were designed for zero to 1 degree positive max. Anything more, binding sets in. If you weld the steel bushing sleeve the binding will still be there wearing the bushing. How much caster are you running?
 
The attached is a depiction of what has happened. The LCA's were part of a kit I bought from California Mustang back in the 80's. Maybe they were just crap control arms and the press fit of the bushing-to-Control Arm was not tight enough? One of my rancheros has a similar situation, but not as bad as the mustang. The movement of the LCA vs the bushings happened gradually.

In the attachment, I simulated the bushing being off center. The gray pieces represent the frame support for the inner pivot of the LCA.

@Cleveland Crush: A few months back, I measured -2.2 deg on the left and -1 on the right. Toe and camber were in spec. My turn plates didn't have angle pointers, so the values probably have some error. Since then, I added pointers to the plates.

I'm planning to target 3 degrees of caster. To achieve that, will require a shim behind the forward bolt of the UCA. Previously, I posted with the characterization table and graph, for anyone interested. The table and graph was a result of a kinematic CAD model I created to characterize the suspension's behavior. The focus was on shim thickness vs caster angle.



1725814563248.png
 
The attached is a depiction of what has happened. The LCA's were part of a kit I bought from California Mustang back in the 80's. Maybe they were just crap control arms and the press fit of the bushing-to-Control Arm was not tight enough? One of my rancheros has a similar situation, but not as bad as the mustang. The movement of the LCA vs the bushings happened gradually.

In the attachment, I simulated the bushing being off center. The gray pieces represent the frame support for the inner pivot of the LCA.

@Cleveland Crush: A few months back, I measured -2.2 deg on the left and -1 on the right. Toe and camber were in spec. My turn plates didn't have angle pointers, so the values probably have some error. Since then, I added pointers to the plates.

I'm planning to target 3 degrees of caster. To achieve that, will require a shim behind the forward bolt of the UCA. Previously, I posted with the characterization table and graph, for anyone interested. The table and graph was a result of a kinematic CAD model I created to characterize the suspension's behavior. The focus was on shim thickness vs caster angle.



View attachment 92790
Our factory LCA pivot point does not like much more then about 1 degree positive caster at the illustrated joint. Doesn't matter if you shim the upper control arm or tighten the strut rod to gain caster, it's going to bind right there at the lower bushing pivot point! Live with about 1 degree positive caster or go aftermarket parts for more positive.
 
Last edited:
On my car, the Lower Control Arms (LCA) have migrated forward and have rubbed on mounting framework. This is presumably related to the Strut Rods pulling forward for positive Caster. Wondering if any of you have experience tack welding the bushing to the control arm to prevent the bushing from moving, relative to the arm. My concern would be to damaging the rubber just inside the tach weld.
The movement or positioning forward or backward doesn't make a difference. But if you wanted to weld it, cooling off with water between tack welds would limit any damage.
 
I went Opentracker then I did his reinforcements.

I also boxed the inner then trimmed them for more clearance

I used a brake piston expander tool to widen my bent LCA frame pocket.

Before and after pix.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0417.jpeg
    IMG_0417.jpeg
    264.9 KB
  • IMG_0418.jpeg
    IMG_0418.jpeg
    338 KB
  • IMG_0485.jpeg
    IMG_0485.jpeg
    446.8 KB
  • IMG_0486.jpeg
    IMG_0486.jpeg
    381.4 KB
  • IMG_0487.jpeg
    IMG_0487.jpeg
    351.9 KB
  • IMG_0488.jpeg
    IMG_0488.jpeg
    344.4 KB
  • IMG_0489.jpeg
    IMG_0489.jpeg
    371.8 KB
I went Opentracker then I did his reinforcements.

I also boxed the inner then trimmed them for more clearance

I used a brake piston expander tool to widen my bent LCA frame pocket.

Before and after pix.
Your first picture looks like what I have going on. Did you have rubber or polyurethane strut rod bushings in the "before" configuration?
 
I wouldn't worry about damaging the rubber inside the bushing. Only a small portion of the bushing will heat up. Just remember to make it a quick tack. I use original control arms that are boxed and lower bushings double tacked. If you have a car that will mostly see the street, I feel that's the way to go.
 
Same thing happened to one of mine. Just poor repro quality I think. I put 3 tack welds around the outer bush. Cool it quickly as others have suggested and the rubber won't be damaged.
 
eccentric eliminators go along way on freeing up binding caused by hi torque on LCA eccentrics.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0980.jpeg
    IMG_0980.jpeg
    1.9 MB
eccentric eliminators go along way on freeing up binding caused by hi torque on LCA eccentrics.
Get it aligned with the eccentric then swap to eliminators.

Also I prefer the Opentracker ones as you don’t have to remove the bolt to make changes.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0635.jpeg
    IMG_0635.jpeg
    1.5 MB
Back
Top