This brings up the question as to what is considered "original", or "restored original".
There are basically three different interpretations of what people will consider as "original/ restored original".
1) The vehicle in the EXACT state of trim as manufactured on the assembly-line with the exception of typical wear items ( tires, brakes, filters, belts, hoses, etc...)
This means the same exact color as originally manufactured, even if new paint.
2) Restored to a condition that it COULD have been ordered and manufactured as on the assembly-line, but keeping consistent with all the specific ordering restrictions in place for various models.
3) A car that has been restored with only OEM or OEM-apperaing parts, even if that specific combination of parts on any particular could never have been ordered as such.
Personally I usually only consider a car described in #1 as original...although there are many others who have looser or different interpretations.
My own car falls somewhere between all three descriptions: It has the appearance of an original car to most, with the correct combination of parts and trim for the model...but many, many "deviations" have been made by me over the years. Some out of preference, others out of neccesity.
My Magnums are reproductions, and the rears are 8"...never a factory option. My suspension is heavily modified, lighting is 95% LED, several parts have repaired or "fabbed up" over the years, and lots of budget-friendly repro parts have been utilized as well.
Even the paint is a different shade of red. ( I absolutely HATE the shade of the OEM red).
So, even though casual observers may think mine is original...it is far, far from it.
I have however resisted adding any incorrect options over the years, with the exception of a totally incorrect front spoiler. Not really a concern on mine, as it was fully loaded to begin with.
But...no wheel-house trim, rocker moldings for me.