Hi 7173 Mustangs Forum !
Trying to decide on what Radiator to buy and install in my 1971 Mustang Grande 351c 3-speed Auto.
I could keep it fairly original with copper brass core 3-row using ACP or US Radiator:
https://www.cjponyparts.com/acp-radiator-3-row-saddle-mount-302-351c-429-1971-1973/p/RAD3813/
https://usradiator.com/product/ford-mustang-1967-69-v8-260-289-302-351-radiator
or switch to an aluminum core 3-row using ColdCase:
https://www.coldcaseradiators.com/product/71-73-mustang-auto-aluminum-performance-radiator
Opinions on radiators seem to vary also, just like politics and grain or non-grain dog food, lol, I was always told Aluminum cools the best, now I found a forum that actually put down the Aluminum with thicker tubbing and put up the Copper/Brass models with the thinner tubbing.
https://www.allfordmustangs.com/threads/best-radiator-for-classic-v8-cars.1080543/
"3 core brass, or if you must, 2 core aluminum."
"Imps, any radiator is an engineering solution, and a compromise between surface area and flow. The copper tubes are softer in a brass radiator, and can only be made 'so wide' without wanting to collapse. Aluminum, despite being not-quite-so-good at conducting heat, is stiffer. That means a flattened tube can be wider, so it is.
Brass tubes are typically 1/2" wide, while aluminum ones are 1". By the time all is said and done, if you went to a 'three core' (three thicknesses of tubes and fins) with aluminum, you have more surface area to cool with (which is good!) but air has a much harder time making it through so you lose too much airflow. Same with 4-core+ brass radiators.
So, simply said: 2 core brass is not enough cooling, 4 cores inhibits airflow. One core aluminum is not enough, but 3 is far too much, and too thick."
Oh and I found another article which actually indicates the 351c is better off running HOT, less wear and tear on the motor ?
I had previously thought 180 degrees was optimal and less than that was okay to run a bit cooler from (170 - 175), but they were saying its okay to run at 200+ to keep moisture out...
https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/clevelands/how-hot-is-too-hot-for-a-cleveland-t9549.html
*What do folks on this forum think concerning the Radiators I mentioned and have any of you had good or bad luck with any of them ?
I received great advice on my last post regarding Seat Tracks, which nobody else really knew about, so figured why not try to ask about Radiators.
This is going to be next project right after I install a PA Performance Alternator 1614e ALT56, which hopefully is Clocked correctly or close to 7:30 and I've got their 1G/3G convertor 462802C ATLCK, both sets of wires w/out w/ gauges WALT7A and WALT7B and 14 gauge power wire regular 9404 and electrolytic copper 9405. Supposed to put out 60 AMPs at Idle and 120 AMPs at 2000 RPM, so a step up in the right direction...
Thank you kindly,
David
Trying to decide on what Radiator to buy and install in my 1971 Mustang Grande 351c 3-speed Auto.
I could keep it fairly original with copper brass core 3-row using ACP or US Radiator:
https://www.cjponyparts.com/acp-radiator-3-row-saddle-mount-302-351c-429-1971-1973/p/RAD3813/
https://usradiator.com/product/ford-mustang-1967-69-v8-260-289-302-351-radiator
or switch to an aluminum core 3-row using ColdCase:
https://www.coldcaseradiators.com/product/71-73-mustang-auto-aluminum-performance-radiator
Opinions on radiators seem to vary also, just like politics and grain or non-grain dog food, lol, I was always told Aluminum cools the best, now I found a forum that actually put down the Aluminum with thicker tubbing and put up the Copper/Brass models with the thinner tubbing.
https://www.allfordmustangs.com/threads/best-radiator-for-classic-v8-cars.1080543/
"3 core brass, or if you must, 2 core aluminum."
"Imps, any radiator is an engineering solution, and a compromise between surface area and flow. The copper tubes are softer in a brass radiator, and can only be made 'so wide' without wanting to collapse. Aluminum, despite being not-quite-so-good at conducting heat, is stiffer. That means a flattened tube can be wider, so it is.
Brass tubes are typically 1/2" wide, while aluminum ones are 1". By the time all is said and done, if you went to a 'three core' (three thicknesses of tubes and fins) with aluminum, you have more surface area to cool with (which is good!) but air has a much harder time making it through so you lose too much airflow. Same with 4-core+ brass radiators.
So, simply said: 2 core brass is not enough cooling, 4 cores inhibits airflow. One core aluminum is not enough, but 3 is far too much, and too thick."
Oh and I found another article which actually indicates the 351c is better off running HOT, less wear and tear on the motor ?
I had previously thought 180 degrees was optimal and less than that was okay to run a bit cooler from (170 - 175), but they were saying its okay to run at 200+ to keep moisture out...
https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/clevelands/how-hot-is-too-hot-for-a-cleveland-t9549.html
*What do folks on this forum think concerning the Radiators I mentioned and have any of you had good or bad luck with any of them ?
I received great advice on my last post regarding Seat Tracks, which nobody else really knew about, so figured why not try to ask about Radiators.
This is going to be next project right after I install a PA Performance Alternator 1614e ALT56, which hopefully is Clocked correctly or close to 7:30 and I've got their 1G/3G convertor 462802C ATLCK, both sets of wires w/out w/ gauges WALT7A and WALT7B and 14 gauge power wire regular 9404 and electrolytic copper 9405. Supposed to put out 60 AMPs at Idle and 120 AMPs at 2000 RPM, so a step up in the right direction...
Thank you kindly,
David
Last edited by a moderator: