starting to plan for a winter engine build

MustangNJ

VIP Members
Joined
Apr 7, 2019
Messages
286
Reaction score
11
Location
NJ
My Car
1990 Bronco, Eddie Bauer, 306ci
1978 F150 Ranger, 545 Stroker
1973 Mexican Mach 1 ( final confirmation TBD), 351C
[url=https://ibb.co/kqFMPqf][img]https://i.ibb.co/GCjFrCL/pic1.jpg[/img][/url]
so far the 351w 4v in my Mexican Mach 1 is running well.  it took some doing, but its not reliable and sounds good.  which means its now time to think about HP and torque.  I can't really guess at what HP this tired old engine is making right now, but maybe 190hp? I don't know.

what I do know is that I want a bunch more low end hp and torque. by low end, I want real gains at 2500-4000 rpm.  I'm really not interested in power bands that only come on at 6500 rpm, etc.  the 545 stroker in my 78 Ranger has low end torque and hp that I like, but that of course is a different block.

at first I was thinking I could get away with a top-end "kit" for the 351: heads, intake, cam, headers, but I don't think that will give me what I want on the low end.  So now I'm thinking that I need to rebuild the motor to a 427 to get what I want.  has anyone done a build on a 351 to a 427?  how were the results ?  I figure I need 400hp+ below 4000 rpm to get what I want.  any advice?

my intended use is stop light to stop light, maybe a track day at the strip once/twice per year.  my car sounds great, but has far more bark than bite right now, and thats with the fresh 3.73 gear.  I don't know the health of the current motor, compression could be off, etc

thanks

 

mpbsr

VIP Members
Joined
Mar 7, 2013
Messages
1,277
Reaction score
24
Location
New Jersey
My Car
1973 Mustang Convertible (Mach I Tribute)
My 302 was rebuilt 4 years ago, but wish I had the knowledge to rebuild it myself.

Could have saved a ton on labor and added more power.

Not sure where in NJ you are, but maybe looking for an asst?

 
Last edited by a moderator:

MustangNJ

VIP Members
Joined
Apr 7, 2019
Messages
286
Reaction score
11
Location
NJ
My Car
1990 Bronco, Eddie Bauer, 306ci
1978 F150 Ranger, 545 Stroker
1973 Mexican Mach 1 ( final confirmation TBD), 351C
[url=https://ibb.co/kqFMPqf][img]https://i.ibb.co/GCjFrCL/pic1.jpg[/img][/url]
I think I may approach this in 2 parts. Part 1 Top end: Heads, Intake, Cam, carb, headers. if that does not get me where i want to be, then Part 2: bore and stroke. I think by making the right choices in Part 1, everything can be used if I go ahead with part 2. first I need to make sure the block is worth investing in.

 

72MustangSprint

VIP Members
Joined
Jan 12, 2012
Messages
1,061
Reaction score
31
Location
Tenn
My Car
1972 Mustang Sprint coupe
Another thought, buy a nice crate motor and save original motor for stock rebuild at later time.

 

Hemikiller

VIP Members
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
3,313
Reaction score
504
Location
Killingworth, CT
My Car
71 Mach 1
65 coupe
Another thought, buy a nice crate motor and save original motor for stock rebuild at later time.
I was thinking the same thing, given he states he doesn't have a garage to work in. Buying a pre-run dynoed crate engine would save a lot in down time and shop labor costs. It would simply be an R&R job that any decent shop can do. Then again, I rebuilt my first engine in the parking lot of my college apartment complex.

 

72MustangSprint

VIP Members
Joined
Jan 12, 2012
Messages
1,061
Reaction score
31
Location
Tenn
My Car
1972 Mustang Sprint coupe
Another thought, buy a nice crate motor and save original motor for stock rebuild at later time.
I was thinking the same thing, given he states he doesn't have a garage to work in. Buying a pre-run dynoed crate engine would save a lot in down time and shop labor costs. It would simply be an R&R job that any decent shop can do. Then again, I rebuilt my first engine in the parking lot of my college apartment complex.
He said he wanted a 427 Windsor motor so crate may be the way to go. Hemi, I remember Shade  tree but not shade complex mechanics

 

MustangNJ

VIP Members
Joined
Apr 7, 2019
Messages
286
Reaction score
11
Location
NJ
My Car
1990 Bronco, Eddie Bauer, 306ci
1978 F150 Ranger, 545 Stroker
1973 Mexican Mach 1 ( final confirmation TBD), 351C
[url=https://ibb.co/kqFMPqf][img]https://i.ibb.co/GCjFrCL/pic1.jpg[/img][/url]
the thing is, I am struggling with the idea of ditching the original motor in this 1/600 Mexican Mach 1. I know that rare does not mean valuable, but the car is currently numbers matching. I believe that the motor may have been rebuilt in 1981, and may not be a great block to invest in now. if that is the case, a crate motor is probably the way to go. or if I go with a top end now, and find I can't rebuild later, I can get a 427 short block.

my biggest thing is I don't want to be making all my power at 6500 rpm. I have a 306 in my Bronco that is the wrong engine for the truck. it makes 400hp at 6,000rpm. but who the heck drives a 1990 Bronco at 6,000 rpm? I don't want to make another mistake on the Mach 1. the 545 in my 78 Ranger was a great decision. the 306 in my Bronco was not a good choice.

 

72MustangSprint

VIP Members
Joined
Jan 12, 2012
Messages
1,061
Reaction score
31
Location
Tenn
My Car
1972 Mustang Sprint coupe
That’s why I suggested the crate motor for power and you don’t have to bore and stroke the motor in your car if it’s original. Seems like a win win, also not much down time.

 

rackerm

Rich
Joined
Aug 30, 2014
Messages
1,423
Reaction score
82
Location
Delaware
My Car
Stock 1973 Mustang Convertible with a 351C 2v and C6
Modified 1970 Mach 1 M-Code with a 351C 4v Manual

That’s why I suggested the crate motor for power and you don’t have to bore and stroke the motor in your car if it’s original. Seems like a win win, also not much down time.
+1  I agree, keep the original motor as is, set it aside and go with a crate motor.

 

MustangNJ

VIP Members
Joined
Apr 7, 2019
Messages
286
Reaction score
11
Location
NJ
My Car
1990 Bronco, Eddie Bauer, 306ci
1978 F150 Ranger, 545 Stroker
1973 Mexican Mach 1 ( final confirmation TBD), 351C
[url=https://ibb.co/kqFMPqf][img]https://i.ibb.co/GCjFrCL/pic1.jpg[/img][/url]
a crate might be the best thing. I never intend to restore my car, so numbers matching is probably not something I need to be concerned with. I am building a driver that does what I want. it will always look a bit dusty, but it will rip and not break.

getting a crate engine opens up a whole new bag of questions: do I stick with a small block so I can keep my existing trans? if so, do I get a 427? does a big block make more sense, but prob my current trans won't work. I want low end torque and hp, so it seems that I need displacement. like I have mentioned, I don't want to have to have the rpms screaming all the time to build power at 6500. i want good power at 2,000 - 4,000 rpms.

what I do know is that I'm not going to put a $10,000 motor in a $15k car. that will obv limit crate choices

 
Last edited by a moderator:

mpbsr

VIP Members
Joined
Mar 7, 2013
Messages
1,277
Reaction score
24
Location
New Jersey
My Car
1973 Mustang Convertible (Mach I Tribute)
a crate might be the best thing.  I never intend to restore my car, so numbers matching is probably not something I need to be concerned with.  I am building a driver that does what I want. it will always look a bit dusty, but it will rip and not break.

getting a crate engine opens up a whole new bag of questions:  do I stick with a small block so I can keep my existing trans?  if so, do I get a 427?  does a big block make more sense, but prob my current trans won't work.  I want low end torque and hp, so it seems that I need displacement.  like I have mentioned, I don't want to have to have the rpms screaming all the time to build power at 6500. i want good power at 2,000 - 4,000 rpms.

what I do know is that I'm not going to put a $10,000 motor in a $15k car. that will obv limit crate choices
I would agree with lower end torque being more desirable then higher end.

Therefore, with keeping the price within reason, I would go with rebuilding it since you can; plus as you said winter project.

 

MustangNJ

VIP Members
Joined
Apr 7, 2019
Messages
286
Reaction score
11
Location
NJ
My Car
1990 Bronco, Eddie Bauer, 306ci
1978 F150 Ranger, 545 Stroker
1973 Mexican Mach 1 ( final confirmation TBD), 351C
[url=https://ibb.co/kqFMPqf][img]https://i.ibb.co/GCjFrCL/pic1.jpg[/img][/url]
If I am going to go with a new top-end, what are the 3-4 things I should check the engine for first, to make sure the engine is good enough for the new top end. Compression check? check bore to see if its ever been rebuilt? what else? thanks

 

pedstagn71

VIP Members
Joined
May 11, 2014
Messages
104
Reaction score
1
Location
Kearney, Nebraska
My Car
1971 mustang coupe complete restoration
I have a 408 stroker built by proformance unlimited in Florida and it’s kicking 450hp and 530 ftlbs of torc at 4500rpm.   You tell them what you want out of it and how you plan to drive it and they build it complete turnkey.  Steve there is very knowledgeable about the parts and very easy to talk to

 
Last edited by a moderator:

73pony

VIP Members
Joined
Jul 6, 2015
Messages
4,241
Reaction score
91
Location
Iowa
My Car
1973 Mustang Grande 351C 2v
Looks like a pretty nice torque curve there. Bet it is a blast to drive.

 

pedstagn71

VIP Members
Joined
May 11, 2014
Messages
104
Reaction score
1
Location
Kearney, Nebraska
My Car
1971 mustang coupe complete restoration
It is a lot of fun to drive. I had 389 gears and do quite a bit of hiway driving so I changed them to 325 and still have a lot of power off the line I’m very pleased with it

 
Top