Suggestions for carb/intake combination mild rebuild

Help Support 7173Mustangs.com:

timachone

I love my nostrils!
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
1,898
Reaction score
426
Location
Germany, Southwest, Black Forest
My Car
1973 Ford Mustang Mach 1 T5 Q-Code 4-Speed
Hey guys,

I get not rid of the thought that my current setup of my rebuild in my restoration is not the optimum in perfomance as it could be...

Currently I have rebuilt the original 2-bolt-block, original crank, original rods, '70 heads with porting and milling, stainless one-piece valves, 3-piece springs etc. with a 274XE CompCams Xtreme Energy cam which have similar Boss-cam-specs as 274/286 duration etc. Topped it by a Offenhauser 360 degree Even-Flow single plane intake and a 4300A Autolite 600 cfm.

Before rebuilt with a unknown cam I had 281 netto horsepower on the dyno with all the worn out hardware and gaskets, piston rings etc.

But now I think it could be better than that. The cam had a rpm-width of 2.000-6.000, the current intake from 1.800 to 6.000-8.800, depending on carb.

So my question is, would this be a good combination or should I change the carb for a 750 cfm Holley for example? Or is that to big and I have to go better with a 670 or 650? Or should I forget the manifold and go for a dual plane?

I have some other parts too:

an original 73 spreadbore cast manifold with an original 73 spreadbore 4300D carb

a '70 squarebore 4V cast manifold

Since I am a bit on a budget what are your suggestions?

Hold the current setup but go for a bigger carb?

Take the 600 Autolite and the 70 cast iron intake and install it?

Take the 73 spreadbore parts and throw them on the Block?

Or should I forget that all and should buy different parts as a Edelbrock Performer or Air Gap? Or should nothing go over a blue thunder?

Remind please that I have the ram air for clearance. And I want something like in the Boss-range performance, a car, that could easily rev, but not over the top. Should say with 330 HP and a good strong rpm-width to 6.000 I would be satisfied, no need to go up to 400 with that mild built.

Hope to hear some suggestions out of personal experiences and would be happy with!

Thank you very much!

Gesendet von meinem F5121 mit Tapatalk

 

OzCoupe72

VIP Members
Joined
Nov 15, 2016
Messages
650
Reaction score
15
Location
Australia
My Car
1972 Mustang Coupe 302 Auto RHD
You didn't say what cubic inches, 2V or 4V or comp ratio but based on the cam you are using a dual plane intake and 650/670 carby would do well

RPM Air Gap is a good dual plane intake but not sure of clearance problems with the ram air especially if you use a 1 inch spacer between carb/manifold

If you're going for a stroker engine then a 750/770 carb is ideal

Using what you have might work fine but will depend on your combination and engine specs

Perhaps post your specs and other more experienced members will chime in

 

timachone

I love my nostrils!
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
1,898
Reaction score
426
Location
Germany, Southwest, Black Forest
My Car
1973 Ford Mustang Mach 1 T5 Q-Code 4-Speed
Oh,

sorry, I did forget that :whistling: 

It is a 351C 4V with a 4-speed and 3.55 gears. Tires and rims will be 215/70R14.

Compression ratio I do not know - it is a 72/73 standard 2-bolt block with a milled 4M crankshaft, factory rods and some clean and even pistons. The heads are not the '73 ones, instead there are 1970 closed chamber 4V quench heads, ported and milled for better flow.

Headers wise I have Hooker Competition Headers 6915HKR, 2,5" pipes and Flowmaster American Thunder Mufflers.

 
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,027
Reaction score
31
Location
Wake Forest, NC
My Car
1971 Sports Roof Fastback (early model)
1973 Coupe -Under rebuild/restore
timachone,

I am with OzCoupe72. I would save your old equipment and get the Air-Gap dual plane and a new Holley . I would recommend the FiTech 600, but, i know you mentioned your budget plays a big roll. No spacers though for Ram Air clearance.

According to Summit Racing Carburetor CFM, 6500 RPM , 362 Cubes, Street 578.2 CFM and race is 748.93 CFM.

Interesting as Mr. Spock would say!

 
Last edited by a moderator:

timachone

I love my nostrils!
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
1,898
Reaction score
426
Location
Germany, Southwest, Black Forest
My Car
1973 Ford Mustang Mach 1 T5 Q-Code 4-Speed
Thank you for your rating ::thumb:: 

I have often read (mostly between the lines) that an upgrade from a good stock cast iron to a classic Edelbrock Performer 351C 4V nothing gains than fuel mileage and wheight. That isn't that much for the money I think for an occasional just for fun driving car...

But then I read that the Ede RPM Air gap is a different kind of intake - alone for the rpm-range which is said from 1.500 - 6.500. So I assume that there are more advantages than wheight and mileage, right? Any personal experiences?

According to you words I would have no clearance issues with that intake and ram air if getting off of any spacer?

Would it be a proper way to take this RPM Air gap intake and combining it with a 670 cfm Holley street avenger according to the upgraded 274XE cam (2.000 - 6.000 rpm range)? Thinking of hat a 750 cfm would be too much...

 

timachone

I love my nostrils!
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
1,898
Reaction score
426
Location
Germany, Southwest, Black Forest
My Car
1973 Ford Mustang Mach 1 T5 Q-Code 4-Speed
The most important question is if there would be clearance issues with ram air. That makes also a decision point... If I can't use the RPM Air Gap with ram air on a 4V I have only few choices I think... But before I would buy a standard Performer for almost no gain am I better with a stock cast iron, especially the 1970 4V squarebore? For how much rpm are they good? Or would it be better by all means than any of the intakes I have?

Questions over questions... :whistling:

Thank you for help!

 

timachone

I love my nostrils!
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
1,898
Reaction score
426
Location
Germany, Southwest, Black Forest
My Car
1973 Ford Mustang Mach 1 T5 Q-Code 4-Speed
Found some threads here which let assume that there a clearance issues with a RPM Air Gap and ram air so if confirmed this intake is unfortunately not the one I can bolt on...

So my other questions are still standing.

Thanks ;)

 

Omie01

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 4, 2014
Messages
911
Reaction score
34
Location
Minnesota, USA
My Car
1972 H code fastback Boss 351 clone
I currently have the RPM Air-Gap on my car, and you for sure will NOT be able to use Ram-Air. That said, it does pull strong, BUT I think the port mismatch leaves a little to be desired. I have a Pro-Systems 780 XP carb and it works REALLY good!!! I tried a standard 750 and 850 DP carb and actually lost power. I am going to try a Blue Thunder intake this year, which is a glorified stock Boss intake because I think it will out perform the Air-Gap. I might lose a little on the bottom end, but there is plenty to spare, I just think it will pull harder through the RPM range with proper port match. But as I have said before, I think Cleveland heads are very special, especially the CC version, and for them to run their best you have to use what was made for them. I am by no means an expert, just giving my 2-cents. I have heard many times that the stock square bore intake works very well with iron 4v CC heads, out of what you have I would try that with a 750. Then you can have your Ram-Air and an intake that is capable of moving the air/fuel that a good Holley can deliver. Good luck!!

 

timachone

I love my nostrils!
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
1,898
Reaction score
426
Location
Germany, Southwest, Black Forest
My Car
1973 Ford Mustang Mach 1 T5 Q-Code 4-Speed
Thanks for your suggestion, I think that too. What I read out of many articles is for normal abuse and a dual plane the Blue Thunder and a Holley is the measure of all things!

So that could be the more expensive but also ultimate solution for my needs. According to a few threads here the Blue Thunder would also clear the ram air quite good if not used a spacer, only a gasket.

Then I think a budget solution would be taking the '70 squarebore and go with a Holley first ::thumb:: This would allow me a little spacer too...

But with the size: wouldn't a 750 cfm be too big for that setup? I thought more in a 650-680 cfm dimension, for example a 650 Double Pumper (4777)... Or what are your personal experiences/preferences with such setups?

 

73pony

VIP Members
Joined
Jul 6, 2015
Messages
4,241
Reaction score
92
Location
Iowa
My Car
1973 Mustang Grande 351C 2v
Thanks for your suggestion, I think that too. What I read out of many articles is for normal abuse and a dual plane the Blue Thunder and a Holley is the measure of all things!

So that could be the more expensive but also ultimate solution for my needs. According to a few threads here the Blue Thunder would also clear the ram air quite good if not used a spacer, only a gasket.

Then I think a budget solution would be taking the '70 squarebore and go with a Holley first ::thumb:: This would allow me a little spacer too...

But with the size: wouldn't a 750 cfm be too big for that setup? I thought more in a 650-680 cfm dimension, for example a 650 Double Pumper (4777)... Or what are your personal experiences/preferences with such setups?
Keep in mind the "online calculators" for carb sizing are based on standard head designs. The Cleveland is a different animal all together. Clevelands like a little more carb. I would think for your set up a 750 would be about right in the ball park. That is what I am running on 2v CC heads. If you do go the blue thunder route you may be able increase that carb size a little more, just depends on how hard you want to run it.

 

c9zx

VIP Members
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Messages
5,433
Reaction score
336
Location
Mustang, OK.
My Car
1972 Mach 1 Q code
2007 GT
1969 Cougar Eliminator B302
CSX 7000 Shelby Cobra FIA
2020 Edge ST
2002 F250 V10
Match the primary bores of the 1970 intake to the secondaries to make it truly a square bore intake. Use a heat isolation gasket or a 1 inch spacer if you have enough clearance for the ram air. The 750 is not too big for what you are doing. Optimizing the calibration of the carb and timing curve will be the path to good power. Chuck

 

OzCoupe72

VIP Members
Joined
Nov 15, 2016
Messages
650
Reaction score
15
Location
Australia
My Car
1972 Mustang Coupe 302 Auto RHD
Like the others said a 750 cfm carb shouldn't be too big for a 351 4V cc

For example our great Aussie Falcon XY GTHO phase 3 had a Holley 780 vac sec as standard

Considering it was a similar engine to your Boss 351 can't see why not

Use a spacer if you can get away with it and if using the iron intake perhaps just port match it

Hopefully someone has used an aftermarket intake with ram air that gives a decent performance gain rather than just weight loss

Don't know much about the Blue Thunder but sounds like your best choice so far

 

c9zx

VIP Members
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Messages
5,433
Reaction score
336
Location
Mustang, OK.
My Car
1972 Mach 1 Q code
2007 GT
1969 Cougar Eliminator B302
CSX 7000 Shelby Cobra FIA
2020 Edge ST
2002 F250 V10
Canted 393,

   Good to see another Eliminator owner here. They are great cars, in my opinion. Chuck

 

Canted 393

VIP Members
Joined
Jan 4, 2016
Messages
310
Reaction score
26
Location
Ne IOWA
My Car
1973 mustang mach1 clone
FMX auto
393 stroker
Canted 393,

   Good to see another Eliminator owner here. They are great cars, in my opinion. Chuck
Thanks, I agree they are really neat. I have never seen a real 1 in person so this will be my first.

Just waiting for better weather to get it shipped down from Canada. Its a 351c , fmx transmission with factory A/C.

 
Top