Wow... someone had a lot of time on their hands. Thanks for clearing things up...
As stated, there were 4 bolt mains left over from the Boss run. As a result, you have the fortunate circumstance of getting a Boss block no charge.My car is a '72 and a CJ (according to the marti report) and has 4 bolt mains. It is the original engine.
Just thought I'd throw that in there. You never know with these cars lol.
Don't tell the wife.Wow... someone had a lot of time on their hands. Thanks for clearing things up...
James I respectfully disagree with a couple of points here.Wow...there is a lot of bad information in this thread. After my rant below are answers to your original questions...
As I recall, you wanted to be able to tell if a block was a CJ or not.
First, there is NO WAY to confirm the block is a CJ. You can discuss date codes on the block, and certainly 72 casting were put in 73 Mustangs....how else would a 73 Mustang bought in October of 73 have a engine. However, it is not outside of the realm of possibilities a 71 casting made it into a 73. And certainly, 73 castings were found in Mustangs. I had one. From the dealer. June 1973.
Second, regarding 4 bolt mains. I have torn apart 3 351C motors- 1971,1972, 1973. All were factory 4V motors. Zero had 4 bolt mains. As stated previously, I am unaware of any 4 bolt 351C motor except the Boss and a few stragglers in 1971. It is fairly easy and not uncommon to have builders add the bolts. But a 4 bolt main is no guarantee of a 351C CJ.
Third, in the 1973 Ford Service Manual and Specifications Manual(Both attached), you will find the following:
1. The SPECIFICATION MANUAL(Second and final printing) does not mention the HO. Only the CJ.
2. The Service Manual mentions the CJ once. In regards to the VIN. This is where the famous Q CODE designation is found. If someone can show me other pages mentioning CJ, I would sure like to see them.
3. The service manual mentions HO multiple times. In fact, it is pretty interesting to review the differences(very few and very slight) between the HO and non HO motor. It is interesting the piston clearance is greater in the HO.
Now, are the manual and specification booklets perfect sources of information. NO. Try to find a reference to the 351 BOSS in the 1971 Ford Service Manuals.
In the end the use of the term CJ was just a marketing ploy. tHO was probably used, but then someone realized it was "false advertising", so they went to the tried and true CJ from the 428 and 429 glory days.
1. were there cobra jets in 73. Well, not technically a cobra jet. A CJ.
2 what qualifies a 351 as a CJ See Attachments
3 how do we identify a CJ apart from pulling the sump off to see the 4 bolt mains , is this right? WRONG
4 mine is a 73 Q code i have the marti report it says Q 351 4V Engine
should it say CJ if it is a CJ ? CJ MIGHT BE ON THE AIR CLEANER DECAL and on the EMISSION STICKER ON THE VALVE COVER.
and just to make it more confusing im the 3rd owner a doctor bought it in 73
1 has no power steering as not stated on report. Doesn't matter
2 has air cond Doesn't matter.
3 had dealer fitted ram air as i know factory ram air wasnt available for Q code
No Big Deal.
4 diff is 9 conventional 3.25 non posi track...not an issue
hurst shifter with dealer T bar Knob. Not an issue.
it just seems a weird combo no power steering but all the go fast bits but no posi trak?
Doesn't matter.
so if any of this makes sence im just wondering if she,s a cobra jet or not
thanks guys
Dave Tommy
If your VIN is a Q code as shown on page 1 of the first attachment, and the motor is original to the car(Don't know how you determine that), then it would be a CJ. I don't think the term COBRA JET was used. CJ was used to imply Cobra Jet...thereby the lack of cobra's anywhere on the car.
Well. For starters. VIN is stamped in block(VERIFIED!Wow...there is a lot of bad information in this thread. After my rant below are answers to your original questions...
As I recall, you wanted to be able to tell if a block was a CJ or not.
First, there is NO WAY to confirm the block is a CJ. You can discuss date codes on the block, and certainly 72 casting were put in 73 Mustangs....how else would a 73 Mustang bought in October of 73 have a engine. However, it is not outside of the realm of possibilities a 71 casting made it into a 73. And certainly, 73 castings were found in Mustangs. I had one. From the dealer. June 1973.
Second, regarding 4 bolt mains. I have torn apart 3 351C motors- 1971,1972, 1973. All were factory 4V motors. Zero had 4 bolt mains. As stated previously, I am unaware of any 4 bolt 351C motor except the Boss and a few stragglers in 1971. It is fairly easy and not uncommon to have builders add the bolts. But a 4 bolt main is no guarantee of a 351C CJ.
Third, in the 1973 Ford Service Manual and Specifications Manual(Both attached), you will find the following:
1. The SPECIFICATION MANUAL(Second and final printing) does not mention the HO. Only the CJ.
2. The Service Manual mentions the CJ once. In regards to the VIN. This is where the famous Q CODE designation is found. If someone can show me other pages mentioning CJ, I would sure like to see them.
3. The service manual mentions HO multiple times. In fact, it is pretty interesting to review the differences(very few and very slight) between the HO and non HO motor. It is interesting the piston clearance is greater in the HO.
Now, are the manual and specification booklets perfect sources of information. NO. Try to find a reference to the 351 BOSS in the 1971 Ford Service Manuals.
In the end the use of the term CJ was just a marketing ploy. tHO was probably used, but then someone realized it was "false advertising", so they went to the tried and true CJ from the 428 and 429 glory days.
1. were there cobra jets in 73. Well, not technically a cobra jet. A CJ.
2 what qualifies a 351 as a CJ See Attachments
3 how do we identify a CJ apart from pulling the sump off to see the 4 bolt mains , is this right? WRONG
4 mine is a 73 Q code i have the marti report it says Q 351 4V Engine
should it say CJ if it is a CJ ? CJ MIGHT BE ON THE AIR CLEANER DECAL and on the EMISSION STICKER ON THE VALVE COVER.
and just to make it more confusing im the 3rd owner a doctor bought it in 73
1 has no power steering as not stated on report. Doesn't matter
2 has air cond Doesn't matter.
3 had dealer fitted ram air as i know factory ram air wasnt available for Q code
No Big Deal.
4 diff is 9 conventional 3.25 non posi track...not an issue
hurst shifter with dealer T bar Knob. Not an issue.
it just seems a weird combo no power steering but all the go fast bits but no posi trak?
Doesn't matter.
so if any of this makes sence im just wondering if she,s a cobra jet or not
thanks guys
Dave Tommy
If your VIN is a Q code as shown on page 1 of the first attachment, and the motor is original to the car(Don't know how you determine that), then it would be a CJ. I don't think the term COBRA JET was used. CJ was used to imply Cobra Jet...thereby the lack of cobra's anywhere on the car.
Well. For starters. VIN is stamped in block(VERIFIED!
72 Qcode 351CJ SPRINT VERIFIED by Marti
4 bolt main VERIFIED!
We need to discuss this futher!
I have taken apart
8-10 - 71 4V motors all had 2 bolt mains
10-15 - 72 - 3 4V motors EVERY one had 4 bolt mains.
Also someone said all 73 351 4V's had smaller valves
I have heard they were used in very late 73's but I have never found any yet.
I'm only going by what I have opened up and seen.
Don
James, You are a card! Good one! :goodone:James, seeing you posted this - I now think you are playing -
"VIN is stamped in the block??? Really. Do you have a photo of the VIN on your dash, and a photo of the VIN on the block?"
If so ... :goodone:
If not - wellllllll :huh: No you got to be playing ... nice :goodone:
I stand by ALL 72 and 73 Q code motors had 4 bolt mains
As for your theory of Ford using up the Boss blocks in non Boss 71 cars - Sorry I have never bought that use up parts idea - they needed extra parts for service, counter sales and warrantee work
Don
ALSO 10 - 15 Q codes motors is not a lot
I have had 85 - 71-3 Mustangs
Jeff,
That is awesome... I'll be on ebay tonight looking for the 1973 version!!
Enter your email address to join: