Back in the early 80's in France, 71-73 were not a common sight, and finding one for sale was even tougher.
The cars were relatively young, solid, fuel cheap. So most owners were enjoying them and won't let them go,
very understandable looking at the crap that was driving around at that time.
So after more than one year waiting and searching in all car papers I could lay my eyes on, finally found the perl in the shape of a 17yo junkyard ready, full option grandé, missing 50% of its parts,
damaged and powered by a very tired 2v cleveland.
I wanted perse a mustang, but had to be a 71-73. Coupe, fastback or vert (got a 429 fastback and would love a vert 72 302, just to be complete)
because to me, the line of this model was special. Despite critics claiming it was too big, I actually loved its volume much better than the earlier models.
Still do today, and in fact, as today's cars have gotten bigger, they aged better than the first gen.
As the thread is about the coupe vs fb,
The cons for me
The line of the coupe roof would have been nicer if roof height was similar to fb, so view from side, it would be less sharp to the eye on quarters.
The 73 front bumpers. No matter the body style, this thing must be removed first hour. It's an add-on that ford quickly added for new impacts laws and simply doesn't
pleases my eyes.
The grandé vinyl top. I know many like this 70's add-on. I never liked that thing, not only the straight chrome broke the line, it makes the car look anything but sporty.
Mine was damaged anyway, so 100+ welds further I got that much nicer shiny roof back.
The pros
The coupe is offering better visibility inside.
The trunk is more practical, On the fb, I somehow keep hit my head on the trunk lid
Can't explain why, but interior feels more cosy than in the fb.
For the rest they are identical to me, you get exact same thing. great handling, great power.
Regarding market price, for similar options/condition you get better deal on a coupe than a fb.