griffbl
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2012
- Messages
- 185
- Reaction score
- 9
- Location
- dallas
- My Car
- 1972 Mustang Mach 1
2014 Ford F150
2018 Porsche Panamera
[url=https://ibb.co/i2uhXQ][img]https://preview.ibb.co/h0A0K5/815f.jpg[/img][/url]
Both sides of car appears a bit low to my eye. Not a lot, as these cars are very low slung, but some. Measurements are without a spare tire in back (by phone is my flat fixer, and I drive this car close to home only for now). I don't want to raise her much, as i hate open wheel well, and i went as tall as i easily could with 14's without being too wide for my eye, this car's intended use, etc.
Driver's side rear is 26 3/4" and Passenger more like 26 1/8" on brand new 225/70-14's. Properly inflated....depending on surface, there can be nearly an inch difference. The differential in height is less important, than restoring ride quality, but hopefully I can get it a bit more level when through. Car seems a bit low in back, and my hunch is springs are really pancaked. Ride quality tells me as much. Has air shocks are in place, which are going away ASAP at the same time, as they don't usually help in the ride quality either and really in many cases depending on pre-load work against the spring's design. (I know people sometimes use them to level the rear of their cars, just not for me). I am considering Eaton made to order Springs, and they list one for Mach 1 with 351C and one for351 CJ for a 1972, and options for whether or not factory (HEAVY! ) AC equipped. My H code, factory NON-AC, has aftermarket Vintage Air with a very light compressor, a 4BBL aluminum intake, and headers. SO my guess is weight up front is about factory H code weight without A/C, and not as heavy as factory AC H codes for sure. Also saw some springs at street and Track. I want ride height to be a touch higher than now in a perfect world. So which Eaton spring option would you pick? I am thinking abou the CJ springs as they should be a bit stiffer, and i hope the ride height is correct OR the best Eaton Choice available. Would love some input please.
As for the front, both fenders are currently sitting at 25.5" at the centers over brand new 215/70-R14's. I have used the Scott Drake 600lb front springs listed for 65-73's with much success in K code Mustangs and genuine 65 and 66 Shelbys with the 1" Shelby drop, and they are advertised as causing an 1" drop on their own vs. stock (who knows if they are just taking about 65's, or more or less saying it applies to all years). These springs made tires a close fit on the 65 Fastbacks, but they were great Kit overall. My hunch is the front is lower currently than would be almost any replacement spring. Front tires are brand new 215/70-14's properly inflated. Both front fenders are approximately 25.5" currently.
Shocks will be premium shocks of some sort. Front shock options don't include my beloved Koni's unfortunately, but I know there are a few good options. I will use Bilsteins in the rear for sure.
Thanks for your help!
Driver's side rear is 26 3/4" and Passenger more like 26 1/8" on brand new 225/70-14's. Properly inflated....depending on surface, there can be nearly an inch difference. The differential in height is less important, than restoring ride quality, but hopefully I can get it a bit more level when through. Car seems a bit low in back, and my hunch is springs are really pancaked. Ride quality tells me as much. Has air shocks are in place, which are going away ASAP at the same time, as they don't usually help in the ride quality either and really in many cases depending on pre-load work against the spring's design. (I know people sometimes use them to level the rear of their cars, just not for me). I am considering Eaton made to order Springs, and they list one for Mach 1 with 351C and one for351 CJ for a 1972, and options for whether or not factory (HEAVY! ) AC equipped. My H code, factory NON-AC, has aftermarket Vintage Air with a very light compressor, a 4BBL aluminum intake, and headers. SO my guess is weight up front is about factory H code weight without A/C, and not as heavy as factory AC H codes for sure. Also saw some springs at street and Track. I want ride height to be a touch higher than now in a perfect world. So which Eaton spring option would you pick? I am thinking abou the CJ springs as they should be a bit stiffer, and i hope the ride height is correct OR the best Eaton Choice available. Would love some input please.
As for the front, both fenders are currently sitting at 25.5" at the centers over brand new 215/70-R14's. I have used the Scott Drake 600lb front springs listed for 65-73's with much success in K code Mustangs and genuine 65 and 66 Shelbys with the 1" Shelby drop, and they are advertised as causing an 1" drop on their own vs. stock (who knows if they are just taking about 65's, or more or less saying it applies to all years). These springs made tires a close fit on the 65 Fastbacks, but they were great Kit overall. My hunch is the front is lower currently than would be almost any replacement spring. Front tires are brand new 215/70-14's properly inflated. Both front fenders are approximately 25.5" currently.
Shocks will be premium shocks of some sort. Front shock options don't include my beloved Koni's unfortunately, but I know there are a few good options. I will use Bilsteins in the rear for sure.
Thanks for your help!
Last edited by a moderator: